Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2011 DIGILAW 636 (SC)

Dipak Subhashchandra Mehta v. Central Bureau of Investigation

2011-04-29

B.S.CHAUHAN, P.SATHASIVAM

body2011
ORDER : P. Sathasivam, B.S. Chauhan, JJ. Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the respondents. 2. Mr. Mukul Rohatgi learned Senior Counsel for Petitioner A-4, apart from pointing out that the co-accused, namely, A-2 and A-3 were released on bail both on the ground of serious illness and disability, after taking us through the various proceedings pending before the DRT and other materials about his business transactions submitted that considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody for more than one year and also that he was granted interim bail by the High Court on the ground of medical illness prayed for an order for bail from this Court. 3. On the other hand, Mr P.P. Malhotra, learned Additional Solicitor General after taking us through the serious allegations and the charge-sheet submitted that the case of the present petitioner cannot be compared with the other accused who were ordered to be released on the ground of medical illness. He also submitted that the trial will be completed within a period of three months. According to him, considering the gravity of the allegations made, the present petitioner is not entitled for bail. 4. We have considered the rival contentions and also perused all the relevant documents. 5. In view of the fact that the other two accused, namely, A-2 and A-3 were released mainly on the ground of illness and old age and of the assurance given by the learned Additional Solicitor General that the trial will be completed within a period of three months, we are not inclined to accede to the request of the petitioner. However, we make it clear that for any reason if the trial continues beyond the period assured by the learned Additional Solicitor General, the petitioner is free to move bail application before the Special Court. In such an event the Special Court is permitted to consider it in accordance with law. We also direct the Special Court to make all endeavours for an early completion of the trial as suggested by the learned Additional Solicitor General. 6. The special leave petition is disposed of.