JUDGMENT : Indrani Datta, J.- As per prosecution case, on 9.12.10 at about 1 p.m. deceased Mukesh was plaiying cards with Co-accused Brijbhushan @ Pappu. Santosh was also sitting there. While playing cards, deceased Mukesh and co-accused Birjbhushan statrted quarrelling with each other. Thereafter, co-accused Brijb'hushan and Mataprasad armed with guns and other co-accused Kalicharna and Saran Singh armed with Lathi reached on the spot and co-accused Brijbhushan and Mataprasad in furtherance of their common intention fired gunshots at deceased Mukesh and killed him. Present applicant exhorted co-accused to kill deceased. It is contended by learned counsel on behalf of the applicant that main role of causing firearm injury is attributed against co-accused Brijbhusan @ Pappu. Only role which has been assigned against present applicant is that he exhorted co-accused to kill the deceased. It is further submitted that co-accused Kalicharan has been enlarged on bail in M.Cr.C.No. 1958/11 by Bench of this Court and allegations levelled against present applicant are identical to that of co-accused. Charge-sheet has already been filed. On these grounds, prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application and prayed for its rejection. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, this application is allowed. It is directed that if applicant surrenders before concerned Trial Court, he be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.45,000/- (Rs. Forty Five Thousand Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Trial Court For his regular appearance before concerned Court during trial. He shall also abide by the conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) Cr.P.C.