ORDER: IAs Nos. 2447-48 V.S. Sirpurkar, J. - Mr Rajiv Dutta, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that he has been provided only copy of Report 80 of the Monitoring Committee and prays that the copy of Reports 55, 75 and 88 of the Monitoring Committee may be supplied to him. He further seeks time to file rejoinder to the reply filed by DDA. 2. Copy of the aforesaid reports of the Monitoring Committee be given to the applicant within one week. 3. Two weeks' time is granted to the applicant to file rejoinder to the reply filed by DDA. IAs Nos. 2474-75 and 2476 4. Mr Mukul Rohatgi, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicant seeks time to file rejoinder to the reply filed by DDA. 5. Monitoring Committee is also permitted to file rejoinder to the reply filed by DDA within two weeks from today. IA No. 2348 6. Mr Puneet Jain, learned counsel appearing for the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks' time to file reply to the report of the Monitoring Committee. IAs Nos. 2501, 2502 and 2509 7. Copy of the IAs and the report concerned of the Monitoring Committee be given to MCD to file reply within two weeks from today. 8. Consideration of the replies filed by DDA, MCD and the Delhi Government to Report 85 is deferred till the next date of hearing. Contempt Petition (C) No. 9 of 2006 9. At the request of learned counsel for the applicant, list this petition after two weeks. IA No. 2366 10. Mr Mukul Rohatgi, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicants prays for and is granted two weeks' time to file reply to the report of the Monitoring Committee. IAs Nos. 2206-07 11. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks' time to file reply to the report of the Monitoring Committee. 12. List the aforesaid IAs and Contempt Petition (C) No. 9 of 2006 on 3-8-2011 at 2 p.m. IAs Nos. 2505-06, 2507-08, 2510-11 and IA No. D. No. 56887 of 2011 13. Mr Ranjit Kumar, learned amicus curiae very fairly makes a statement before us suggesting that the applicants have filed certain documents in these IAs and the Monitoring Committee may not have the documents which have now been filed in these IAs. 2505-06, 2507-08, 2510-11 and IA No. D. No. 56887 of 2011 13. Mr Ranjit Kumar, learned amicus curiae very fairly makes a statement before us suggesting that the applicants have filed certain documents in these IAs and the Monitoring Committee may not have the documents which have now been filed in these IAs. The learned amicus curiae suggests that the applicants should approach the Monitoring Committee along with these documents and further affidavits, if any, and apprise the Monitoring Committee of their stand. The Monitoring Committee is directed to hear these applicants and decide within four weeks on the basis of the aforesaid documents. IAs Nos. 1531, 1791, 1846, 1828, 1829, 1830 in IAs Nos. 1531, 1834, 1868-69, 1861, 1862, 1863, 1183, 1216, 1833, 1842, 1905, 1909, 1910 and Contempt Petitions Nos. 134 of 2003, 82 of 2008 and 64 of 2007 14. Mr D.N. Goburdhan, learned counsel appearing for the Delhi Government and the Delhi Pollution Control Board prays for and is granted eight weeks' time to file reply in compliance with order dated 4-5-2011, M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, IAs Nos. 2447-48 in IA No. 22 in WP (C) No. 4677 of 1985 order dated 4-5-2011 (SC), passed by this Court. 15. List these IAs after eight weeks. SLP (C) No. 7239 of 2006 16. IA No. 6 has been filed by the petitioner seeking leave of the Court to withdraw this special leave petition. Permission granted. This special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner, if any.