JUDGEMENT Anjana Prakash, J. 1. No one appears on behalf of the appellants. 2. The appellant is aggrieved with the judgment dated 18.04.1995 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna in Complaint Case No. 132 of 1988/Tr. No. 198/94 by which it has acquitted the respondent for the charges framed under Sections 406 and 409 IPC. 3. On going through the judgment of acquittal, I find that the three witnesses who have been examined on behalf of the complainant have not been able to establish that the accused had misappropriated the jeep of the appellant. Moreover there were several contradictions in the statement of C.W. 1. Having regard to the fact that no perversity has been committed by the Trial Court in acquitting the sole Respondent, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The appeal is dismissed.