Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2011 DIGILAW 927 (SC)

R. N. Mitra v. C. B. I. , Dehradun

2011-07-22

GYAN SUDHA MISRA, HARJIT SINGH BEDI

body2011
Judgment 1. Leave granted. 2. Notice had been issued in this case on 12th November, 2010, restricted to the quantum of sentence only. 3. The trial court awarded the following sentences to the appellant:- U/S Trial Court 420, IPC RI for 5 years Fine Rs.50,000/- and in default of payment of fine RI for 2 years 471 r/w 468, IPC RI for one year Fine Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine RI for 3 months 5(2) r/2 5(1)(d) of the Prevention RI for one year Fine Rs.10,000/- and in default of of Corruption Act payment of fine RI for six months 4. The High Court by the impugned judgment maintained the conviction of the appellant but reduced the sentence in the following terms: U/S Trial Court 420, IPC RI for one year Fine Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine RI for six months 471 r/w 468, IPC RI for one year Fine Rs.1,000/- and in default of payment of fine RI for one month 5(2) r/2 5(1)(d) of the Prevention RI for one year Fine Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of Corruption Act of fine RI for six months 5. It is also evident from the record that the incident pertains to the year 1979 and the trial, appeal and revisional proceedings have gone on for over 30 years. We, therefore, feel that these are special reasons as to why the sentences awarded to the appellant for the aforesaid offences should be reduced from one year to three months. 6. With this modification in the sentence, the appeal is dismissed. The appellant be taken into custody to serve out the remaining part of his sentence. Appeal dismissed.