Research › Search › Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 942 (MP)

Sushiladevi (Smt. ) w/o Kailash Chandra Betala v. Sushiladevi w/o Mishri Lal Betala

2011-08-16

M.C.GARG

body2011
JUDGMENT : M.C. Garg, J.:- The accused cannot participate in the proceedings before the Magistrate till the process is ordered. However, once the Magistrate form his mind and has dismissed the complaint, then, the Revisional Court cannot pass any adverse order against the respondent/accused without hearing the petitioner that is what has stated by the Supreme Court. In view of aforesaid, the objection taken by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents does stand to the ground. In view of that, the revision filed by the petitioners are allowed and the Revisional Court is directed to decide the petitions after hearing the petitioners. As such the impugned order is hereby set aside.