Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had submitted that it would suffice if the respondent is directed to consider the reply, dated 19.12.2011, submitted by the petitioner, pursuant to the order passed by this Court, on 31.10.2011, in W.P.No.20844 of 2011, and if appropriate orders are passed by the respondent considering the said reply. He had further submitted that a notice, dated 20.2.2012, had been issued by the respondent, during the pendency of the present writ petition, requesting the petitioner to appear before him, on 6.3.2012, to file the necessary objections and to avail the opportunity of personal hearing. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had submitted that the reply, dated 19.12.2011, filed by the petitioner would be considered and an appropriate order would be passed, as per law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 4. In view of the above, the respondent is directed to consider the reply of the petitioner, dated 19.12.2011, and to pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs.