RAFIQ, J.—This appeal has been preferred by the appellant insurance company against the award dated 5/3/2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ajmer awarding a sum of Rs.71,600/- to claimant-respondent No.1 for the injuries sustained by him in a road accident, which took place on 19/4/2011 involving the vehicle insured with the appellant insurance company. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant has argued that the Tribunal has erred in law while deciding Issue No.1 against the insurance company holding the driver of the tractor, which was insured with it, sole negligent for committing the accident. No independent eye witness was examined to prove the accident nor name of the motorcyclist was disclosed, who was driving the motorcycle. The investigation officer of the case has also not been examined. The FIR was lodged with the delay of one day. Learned Tribunal has erred in law while awarding excessive amount of compensation under Issue No.5. Medical officer has not been examined to prove the permanent disability of the claimant. Learned Tribunal further erred in law while assessing the loss of earning capacity of the claimant, whereas the claimant failed to adduce evidence in this regard. In other non-pecuniary heads also, the learned Tribunal has awarded excessive amount of compensation. 3. Upon hearing learned counsel for the appellant and perusing the impugned award, I find that the Tribunal has awarded Rs.5,000/- for operation, dependency on others and nutritious diet, Rs.34,600/- has been awarded towards the actual medical expenses. Rs.5000/- for loss of income during medical treatment and Rs.27,000/- has been awarded accepting 2% permanent disability. Thus, awarded a total sum of Rs.71,600/- as compensation, which looking to the aforesaid, cannot be held to be an excessive amount of compensation. I do not find any merit in this appeal, which is accordingly dismissed.