Agrihorticultural Consultants, Represented by Lalitha Mukundan, Proprietrix v. Commissioner of Service Tax
2012-03-08
M.JAICHANDREN
body2012
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 16.2.2008, on merits, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 16.2.2008, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 16.2.2008, to the respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.