Judgment COMMON ORDER: 1. Since, the issues involved in all the writ petitions are similar in nature, they have been taken up together and a common order is being passed. 2. These writ petitions have been filed challenging the summons issued by the respondent, dated 23.9.2009, along with the necessary documents, as shown in the schedule therein. 3. Even though the jurisdiction of the respondent, in issuing the said summons, is under challenge, this Court finds that the writ petitions have become infructuous, in view of the fact that the summons issued by the respondent, on 23.9.2009, are not in force, as on date. Hence, the writ petitions are dismissed, as infructuous. However, it goes without saying that it would be open to the respondents to issue fresh summons, if so advised, in the manner known to law. No costs. Connected M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2009 are closed.