Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2012 DIGILAW 136 (MAD)

C. Dhandapani v. D. Balamurugan

2012-01-09

R.SUDHAKAR

body2012
Judgment :- 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order and decreetal order dated 29.11.2011 passed in E.P.No.51 of 2011 in O.S.No.322 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Panruti. 2. Heard Mrs.R.Meenal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.K.G.Vasudevan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 3. The respondent/plaintiff is aggrieved by the disturbance caused by the revision petitioners/defendants in spite of a decree of a Civil Court in O.S.No.322 of 2005. Therefore E.P.No.51 of 2011 was filed for arrest and for other relief. The court below ordered arrest. Challenging the same, the revision petition has been filed. 4. At the time of final hearing, the revision petitioners as well as the respondents counsel were called upon to state as to the nature of grievance. Today, the learned counsel for the revision petitioners filed an affidavit of undertaking signed by the revision petitioners and attested by the lower court counsel, and it reads as follows:- "1. We are the petitioners in the above Civil Revision Petition. 2. We undertake not to disturb the respondents possession of the property subject matter of O.S.No.322/2005 before the District Munsifs Court Panruti." 5. In view of the affidavit of undertaking as above, the respondent/plaintiff, the decree holder through his counsel had made the following endorsement:- 6. In this Court, the revision petitioners have undertook not to disturb "In view of the undertaking affidavit filed by the revision petitioners, the CRP may be closed and E.P. before the lower Court will not be pursued for the present." respondent/plaintiffs possession of the property subject matter of O.S.No.322 of 2005, the misunderstanding and misgiving between the parties having been resolved by this Court amicably, the order under challenge, namely, the order passed in E.P.No.51 of 2011 in O.S.No.322 of 2005 is set aside. However, liberty is given to the respondent/plaintiff to pursue the matter, if sufficient cause arises in future. 7. This Civil Revision Petition is ordered as above. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.