Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2012 DIGILAW 1378 (RAJ)

Shashikant Bantuge v. State of Rajasthan

2012-05-25

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ

body2012
JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the leaned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available on record during the course of arguments. 2. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the alleged offences have been committed by the accused under Sections 420 and 379 I.P.C. and the recovery has already been made. This is the first offence committed by the accused and he is in jail for the last more than two months. He undertakes that he will not commit any offence in future. 3. The learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. I am inclined to release the accused-petitioner on bail. The bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. 5. It is therefore, ordered that the accused-petitioner namely Shashikant Bantuge son of Pawan Kumar Chhara, R/o Free Colony, Near Chhara Nagar Tank, Kuber Nagar, Sardar Nagar, Ahmedabad (Gujarat). In F.I.R. No. 64/2012 registered at Police Station, Hathipole, District, Udaipur shall be released on bail,. provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each (One surety will be of local person) to the satisfaction of learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.Bail application allowed. *******