Hon'ble BHAGWATI, J.—None of the Advocates has been appearing in the Court today. 2. The matter comes up on an application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, wherein the appellants have beseeched to condone the delay of 758 days in filing the instant appeal. 3. Service of notice is complete on the respondents, but none appears on their beahlf. 4. Having perused the contents of Limitation application, it is noticed that the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dholpur dismissed the claim petition of the claimants appellants vide impugned award dated 28th May, 2008. In the application under Section 5 of Limitation Act, the appellants have revealed that their counsel did not apprise them about the award dated 28th May, 2008 having been passed by the learned Tribunal and always gave fictitious dates saying that their case was pending. The appellants contacted other counsel appearing before the Tribunal on 20th August, 2010, who inquired about the matter and it came to his notice that the present case had already been dismissed by the learned Tribunal vide award dated 28th May, 2008. The appellants applied for certified copy of award and having received the same on 27th August, 2010, filed the instant appeal on 31st August, 2010. The delay occurred in filing the appeal is bonafide. 5. The appellants are found to have assigned no satisfactory or reasonable cause, which prevented them in filing of the appeal after an inordinate delay of 758 days. The appellants are required to explain each day's delay, but they have failed to do so. Hence on account of there being no satisfactory and reasonable cause in not filing the appeal within the stipulated period, the application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act deserves to be dismissed and the same stands dismissed accordingly. 6. Consequent upon the dismissal of application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, the appeal does not survive and the same also stands dismissed being time barred.