Hon'ble BHAGWATI, J.—None of the Advocates has been appearing in the Court today. 2. The matter comes up on an application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, wherein the appellant has beseeched to condone the delay of 1959 days in filing the instant appeal. 3. Service of notice is complete on the respondents, but none appears on their behalf. 4. Having perused the contents of Limitation application, it is noticed that the award was passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bundi on 19th January, 2005. The appellant has submitted in the application that he was injured and because of higher percentage of permanent disability and having no knowledge of the relevant laws of Limitation, could not contact his counsel and that was the only reason, he could not file the appeal within the stipulated period. Hence, having a sympathetic view, the delay of 1959 days be condoned. 5. It is relevant to record that the appellant is expected to explain each day's delay, but he has not explained even one day's delay, whereas the appeal is found to have been filed after an inordinate delay of 1959 days i.e. approximately after six years. Hence, on account of there being no satisfactory and reasonable cause in filing the appeal after an inordinate delay of 1959 days, the application deserves to be dismissed and the same stands dismissed accordingly. 6. Consequent upon the dismissal of application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, the appeal does not survive and that also stands dismissed accordingly.