Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if this Court is pleased to permit the petitioner to make a representation to the second respondent, with regard to the return of the sale deed, dated 22.1.1973, registered on 13.2.1996, along with the other relevant documents, and on such representation being made, the second respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the limited relief sought by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, without going into the merits of the case, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the second respondent, with regard to the return of the sale deed, dated 22.1.1973, registered on 13.2.1996, along with the other relevant documents, within a period of two weeks from today and on receipt of such representation, the second respondent shall dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and the other parties concerned, if any, within a period of four weeks thereafter. The writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.