JUDGMENT Mr. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.: (Oral) - Vide this petition, a prayer has been made for quashing of FIR No.170 dated 26.05.2008, under Sections 406, 498-A, 120-B, 34, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Assandh, District Karnal, on the basis of alleged compromise (Annexure P-2). 2. According to the averments, a compromise had been reached between the parties before Ms. Vani Gopal Sharma, Mediator, Conciliation Centre, Karnal on 11.03.2011. However, complainant-respondent No.2 who is present in the Court has specifically stated that the petitioner has not honoured the compromise and therefore, she is not agreeing for quashing of FIR on the basis of which alleged settlement took place before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, Karnal. 3. In view of the aforesaid fact alone, this petition is liable to be dismissed. 4. Ordered accordingly. 5. Since the plea of petitioner has not been accepted and respondent No.2-complainant, who is a lady and has been dragged to defend this petitioner unnecessarily, the petitioner is liable to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- to respondent No.2, within one month from today. In case, he fails to pay the aforesaid amount, the same shall be recovered from him, as arrears of land revenue. 6. It is also necessary to notice that the reply filed by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Assandh, challan has been presented. The trial Court is directed to decide the complaint pending before it, as early as possible, preferably within six months from today. --------------