Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2012 DIGILAW 1536 (MAD)

D. Ashok Kumar v. Government Of Tamilnadu rep. by its Secretary Municipality Administrative Department

2012-03-28

M.JAICHANDREN

body2012
Judgment :- 1. Mr.M.L.Mahendran, the learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondent 1 and Mr.B.B.Senthilkumar, the learned counsel, takes notice for the respondents 2 and 3. 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the third respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 18.11.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents, have no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the third respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 18.11.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and the other parties concerned, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 18.11.2011, to the third respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.