Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2012 DIGILAW 1588 (MAD)

Mines & Minerals India, Rep. by Managing Partner, v. Rajendran VS Commissioner, Department of Geology & Mining, Guindy

2012-03-29

M.JAICHANDREN

body2012
Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of this writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 23.09.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 23.09.2010, if it is in order, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelveweeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 23.09.2010, to the first respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.