Judgment :- 1. Writ Petitions are filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the letter Na.Ka.No.32/2011 dated 08.03.2012 issued by the third respondent and quash the same with the direction, directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's application under Tamil Nadu Regulation of Wood based Industries Rules 2010 and issue licence to the petitioner's Saw Mill. 2. Mr.N.Inbanathan, learned Government Advocate (Forest) takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. The relief sought for in all the four writ petitions is one and the same. By consent all the writ petitions are taken up together for final disposal. 4. Petitioner in all the writ petitions claims that the impugned order has been passed directing the petitioner not to run the saw mill without a permission granted from the Central Empower Committee constituted in accordance with the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 5. In the impugned order itself it has been stated by the Forest Range Officer that the claim of the petitioner for granting licence has been recommended to the Central Empower Committee. The Competent Authority to grant licence under the Tamil Nadu Regulation of Wood Based Industries Rules, 2010 will be the second respondent based on the directions or instructions that may be issued by the first respondent after approval of the Central Empower Committee. 6. Since the order of the Supreme Court mandates the approval of the Central Empower Committee and the Rules also provides for the same, the second respondent is directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for grant of licence by following the procedure prescribed by law expeditiously preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. The Writ Petitions are disposed of as above. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.