Judgment : The Court : The petitioner in this WP under art.226 dated December 12, 2011 is questioning a notice dated November 16, 2011 (at p.238) issued by the authorised officer of United Bank of India under s.13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. Counsel for the petitioner submits as follows. The petitioner’s business was seriously affected by the cyclone Ila. Most arbitrarily the Insurance Company did not pay the petitioner’s claim. The State Government has not compensated him properly. Above all, the bank that lent money has been behaving inhumanly. It is not inclined to consider the petitioner’s pathetic condition. Hence it is necessary to exercise power under art.226 for granting the petitioner necessary relief. If the Insurance Company has refused to pay the petitioner, then the petitioner should go to the appropriate forum for enforcing his claim. His entitlement is not to be adjudicated by the High Court under art.226. If the State Government has not compensated him, he is free to approach the State Government in an appropriate manner; but that has got nothing to do with the s.13(2) demand notice issued by the authorised officer of the bank. The s.13(2) notice cannot give the petitioner a cause of action to move the Writ Court. It only created his right to submit an objection or representation. It is entirely for the bank to decide whether it will accommodate the petitioner or proceed to recover its dues. Impelled by sympathy I cannot exercise power under art.226. The Writ Court has no sympathy jurisdiction. I am unable to give the petitioner any relief. For these reasons, the WP is dismissed. No costs.