Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2012 DIGILAW 2057 (MAD)

V. Pandiarajan v. Chairman, Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation

2012-04-24

M.JAICHANDREN

body2012
Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 30.09.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, within a stipulated period. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 30.09.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 30.09.2011, to the first respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 5. The writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.