JUDGMENT Mr. L. N. Mittal, J. (Oral):- Plaintiff Joginder Singh has filed this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing order dated 06.01.2012 (Annexure P-7) passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana. 2. Petitioner has filed suit for specific performance of agreement to sell dated 22.06.2007 executed by Satpal through his attorney Amrit Pal Singh – defendant-respondent no.2. Defendant-respondent no.1 Kulbir Kaur is widow of Satpal. 3. Plaintiff-petitioner, by moving application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, sought temporary injunction restraining the defendants from alienating the suit property in any manner to anybody, except the plaintiff, during pendency of the suit. 4. Learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Samrala, vide order dated 26.02.2010 (Annexure P-6), allowed the plaintiff’s application for temporary injunction. However, appeal against said order preferred by defendant no.1 has been allowed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana vide judgment dated 06.01.2012 (Annexure P-7), and thereby, plaintiff’s application for temporary injunction stands dismissed. Feeling aggrieved, plaintiff has filed this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to challenge judgment Annexure P-7 passed by the appellate court. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case file. 6. Without going into rival claims of the parties, interest of both the parties can be safeguarded by directing that if defendants want to alienate the suit land during pendency of suit, they shall specifically recite in the deed of alienation itself about pendency of the suit, so that the alienee becomes aware of the pendency of the suit and may not raise the plea of bona fide purchaser without knowledge of the pendency of the suit. In this manner, interest of plaintiff-petitioner would be protected and defendants would also not suffer any loss or injury. 7. In view of the aforesaid, without entering into the merits of the rival claims of the parties, and without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the suit, the instant revision petition is disposed of with direction that if the defendants, during pendency of the suit, want to alienate the suit property in any manner, they shall specifically recite in the deed of alienation itself about pendency of the suit and shall also inform the trial court, within one month of the execution of alienation deed, about the alienation. ------------