Judgment :- 1. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent University had placed a communication from the Registrar of the respondent University, dated 15.6.2012. The said communication reads as follows: "Sub: Selection of Faculty consisting of Professors, Associate Professors, Assistant Professors etc. wherein Mr. Solanki of MMD, Chennai has applied. With reference to the above it is informed that as per Agenda No.EC.12-03 the Executive Council in its meeting on 21.5.2012 has decided as follows: "After a detailed discussion, the members felt that the said recruitment process of faculty may not be proceeded further, especially in view of deviations from the RR/ Ordinance in the advertisement and also absence of clear observance of reservation policy". 1. Hence the recruitment process of the faculty has been dropped." 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent University had submitted that, in view of the said communication, the recruitment process had been cancelled, pursuant to certain deviations found therein relating to the reservation policy and therefore, the writ petition may be dismissed, as infructuous. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had not refuted the said submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent University. 4. Recording the submissions made on behalf of the parties concerned, the writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous. No costs. Connected M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 are closed.