JUDGMENT Prashant Kumar, J. - This application has been f1led for quashing order dated 05.10.1999 passed by Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class. Jamsedpur in C/1 Case No. 814 of 1999. whereby he took cognizance against the petitioners under Section 387 of the I.P.C. 2. It is submitted by Sri Ananda Sen, learned counsel for the petitioners that from perusal of complaint petition and other materials no offence under Section 387 of the I.P.C. is made out. He submits that admittedly, complainant took truck in question from petitioners on the basis of hire-purchase agreement. It is submitted that petitioners have right to take possession of the truck on non-payment of loan amount. Accordingly, he submits that impugned order may be quashed. 3. On the other hand. Mr. Krishna Shankar, learned Addl.P.P. submits that from the averments made in the complaint petition, offence under Section 387 of the I.P.C. is made out. Accordingly, he submits that Court below rightly took cognizance against the petitioners under Section 387 of the I.P.C. 4. Having heard the submissions. I have gone through the records of the case. 5. Admittedly, Court below took cognizance against the petitioners under Section 387 of the I.P.C. At paragraph 2 of the complaint petition, it is alleged that accused No. 1 put his revolver on the forehead of complainant and, forcibly took his signature on .a paper. It is further alleged that other accused took out leather bag of complainant containing Rs.20.000/- and handed it over to accused No. 1. Thus, in my view. Prima facie offence under Section 387 is made out from the allegations made in the complaint petition. Accordingly, I find that no illegality in the impugned order. 6. In the result, there is no merit in this applications which is accordingly, dismissed. Application dismissed.