JUDGMENT :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the Writ Petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, had submitted that it would suffice, if the impugned order of the third respondent, dated 09.01.2012, suspending the petitioner from the post of Trustee of Arulmighu Kumaran Thirukoil, Thiruvannamalai Town, Thiruvannamalai District and the proceedings of the third respondent, dated 09.01.2012, asking him to hand over the charge of the administration of the said temple to the fit person, appointed by the third respondent, are set aside and if the petitioner is permitted to submit his explanation to the charges levelled against him, in the proceedings, issued by the third respondent, on 09.01.2012, and if the third respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, within a stipulated period. 3. The learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection for this Court passing such an order. 4. In view of the above, the impugned order of the third respondent, dated 09.01.2012, suspending the petitioner from the post of Trustee, Arulmighu Kumaran Thirukoil, Thiruvannamalai Town, Thiruvannamalai District and the impugned order of the third respondent, dated 09.01.2012, directing the petitioner to handover the charge of administration to the fit person, appointed by the third respondent, are set aside. The petitioner shall file his explanation to the charges levelled against him, by the proceedings of the third respondent, dated 09.01.2012, within a period of two weeks from today and on such explanation being submitted, the third respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders, thereon, on merits, and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks thereafter. This Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, Connected Miscallenous Petitions are closed.