Judgment :- 1. The respondent is present in Court today, pursuant to the statutory notice issued to him. 2. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent has once again attached the properties belonging to the petitioners, in spite of an order having been passed, by this Court, on 19.3.2012, in W.P.Nos.5235 of 2012, 5086 of 2012, 5087 of 2012 and W.P.No.26474 of 2011, without referring to the said order. 3. The learned counsel for the respondent had submitted that he had not done anything contrary to the order passed by this Court, on 19.3.2012, as alleged by the petitioners. In its order passed, on 19.3.2012, this Court had said that the original attachment of the property in question shall stand raised, automatically, as such attachment had not been renewed, by the first respondent, by way of subsequent orders. As such, there was no intention on the part of the respondents to wilfully disobey the order of this Court, dated 19.3.2012. Even otherwise, if this Court, for some reason, finds that the respondent had committed contempt of Court, his unconditional apology may be recorded and he may be absolved of the charge. 4. It had been further submitted on behalf of the respondent that fresh show cause notices would be issued to the petitioners, with regard to re-attachment of the properties in question, by referring to the order passed by this Court, on 19.3.2012, in W.P.Nos.5235 of 2012, 5086 of 2012, 5087 of 2012 and W.P.No.26474 of 2011, as well as the contempt petitions, in Contempt petition Nos.870 and 871 of 2012. After receiving the objections, from the petitioners, to the show cause notices to be issued by the respondent, appropriate orders would be passed, on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. 5. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondent, as no further orders are necessary, the contempt petitions are closed. Connected Sub Application No.289 of 2012 is closed.