JUDGMENT Rakesh Kumar Garg, J 1. Quashing of FIR No.151 dated 20.8.2010 registered under Sections 406/ 498-A IPC, P.S. Div. No.7 (Vardhman), Ludhiana is sought on the ground that no cause of action has arisen at Ludhiana, as no entrustment of dowry articles to the petitioners have been alleged to be made at Ludhiana. 2. Counsel for the petitioners has relied upon judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Y.Abraham Ajith & others v. Inspector of Police, Chennai and another 2004(8) SCC 100 and of this Court in the case of Kamaljit Singh & others v. State of Punjab and another (2009) 4 RCR (Criminal) 433. 3. There is no dispute with the proposition of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and this Court in the aforesaid judgments. However, a perusal of FIR in question would show that there are specific allegations that the entrustment of dowry articles took place at Ludhiana. 4. In view of the aforesaid allegation made in the FIR, the same cannot be quashed at the threshhold. Not only this, it has been brought to the notice of this Court that challan has been presented, charges have been framed and trial is going on. 5. In this view of the matter, I find no merit in this petition. 6. Dismissed. 7. However, it is mentioned that in case petitioner No.1, who is stated to be an old lady, makes an application for exemption from her appearance before the Court, the same shall be considered by the trial Court sympethetically.