JUDGMENT : The petitioner will be overage on the cut of date according to the present rules of judicial service to which he wants to be a candidate. 2. For the prayer that his candidature should be accepted, the petitioner relies upon three grounds, which are as follows: (i) Earlier, the age was the same for other Government employment and for judicial service. (ii) The Government has sent a letter increasing the age of appointment of its employees, a copy thereof has been endorsed to the Registrar General of this Court. (iii) The High Court has not considered that request of the Government. On the above grounds the petitioner wants that present set of service rules should be ignored and the petitioner's candidature should be accepted in violation of the Rules. 4. Till the High Court decides to amend the service Rules, and they are actually amended, no Mandamus can be issued directing the respondents to act in violation of the Rules. 5. The writ petition is totally misconceived and accordingly, it is dismissed.