Judgment :- 1. Animadverting upon the order dated dated 26.9.2011 passed by the Sub-Court, Neyveli, in E.P.No.66 of 2010 in A.R.No.459 of 2009, this civil revision petition is filed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioners, who would echo the cride couer of his clients, namely, the petitioners five in number, to the effect that they stood as sureties for the principal debtor, namely, R2-R.Sivaji herein. The Executing Court simply ordered attachment of the salaries of the petitioners herein, which is against law. Without considering the objections raised by the sureties/judgement debtors, they are made to bear the brunt. 3. Perused the records. Admittedly, the revision petitioners/judgement debtors 2 to 6 herein happened to be the sureties and undoubtedly they are also liable along with R2-R.Sivaji-the judgement debtor No.1. 4. The learned counsel or the revision petitions would submit that there is no parity in attaching the salaries of the petitioners also. 5. If there is any grievance relating to the quantum of salaries attached in violation of Section 60 of C.P.C., it is open for the petitioners to petition the Executing Court itself, which would consider the same on merits. 6. The civil revision petition is disposed of accordingly. However, there is no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.