Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the contempt petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had submitted that the order passed by this Court, on 27.2.2012, in W.P.No.1530 of 2012, has been complied with. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had not refuted the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 4. In such circumstances, since, no further orders are necessary, the contempt petition stands closed. No costs.