McGan's Ooty School of Architecture v. Directorate of Technical Education Represented by its Commissioner
2012-08-03
M.JAICHANDREN
body2012
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment :- 1. Since the issues arising for the consideration of this Court, in the above Writ Petitions, are common in nature, a common order is passed. 2. At this stage of the hearing of these Writ Petitions, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner School of Architecture, had submitted that it would suffice, if the Controller of Examinations of the third respondent University, is directed to consider the request of the petitioner School of Architecture to grant the consolidated mark sheets to 10 students, whose names are furnished in the prayer, in W.P.No.16301 of 2012. Even if consolidated marksheets are not available, in respect of the said students, the Controller of Examinations of the third respondent University, may be directed to issue separate marksheets for the examinations written by the said students, as they are available them. 3. Accordingly, in view of the said submissions made on behalf of the petitioner School of Architecture, the petitioner is send an authorised person, on 08.08.2012, to meet the Controller of Examinations, of the third respondent University, along with the available records, relating to the students concerned. Thereafter, the Controller of Examinations, University of Madras, shall examine the same and issue the necessary mark sheets, as they are available with the University, subject to the production of the relevant records, by the petitioner, in respect of the Students concerned, on or before, 24.08.2012. Thereafter, it is for the petitioner to produce the marksheets given by the Controller of Examinations, University of Madras, to the first respondent. On the petitioner furnishing the available records, including the marksheets, the first respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders, considering the request of the petitioner School, for the grant of approval for the students concerned, to pursue the M.Arch course, in the petitioner school of Architecture. The first respondent shall pass such orders, within a period of two weeks thereafter. It is also made clear that the examinations written by the students concerned, by an interim order passed by this Court, on 18.01.2012, in W.P.No.1204 of 2012, and M.P.No.1 of 2012, would be subject to the orders passed by the first respondent, relating to the request of the petitioner for the grant of approval. Writ Petition No.68701 of 2012, is ordered accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 4.
Writ Petition No.68701 of 2012, is ordered accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 4. As the students concerned had written the first semester M.Arch course, which had commenced, on 20.01.2012, as per the interim order passed by this court, on 18.01.2012, no further orders are necessary in the Writ Petition, in W.P.No.1201 of 2012. Hence, the said Writ Petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.