Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2012 DIGILAW 382 (RAJ)

Ramratan v. Sanwalram

2012-02-09

MAHESH BHAGWATI

body2012
Hon'ble BHAGWATI, J.—By way of the instant appeal, the appellant has beseeched to quash and set aside the judgment dated 25th June, 2009, whereby the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Dausa, dismissed the claim petition filed by the claimant-appellant. 2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and carefully perused the relevant material on record including the impugned judgment dated 25th June, 2009. 3. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant and carefully perused the impugned award, it is noticed that the learned Tribunal after taking into consideration all facts emerging on record and critically analyzed the evidence, arrived at finding that the accident as alleged was found not to have taken place and more-over even the claimant-appellant was also not found to have sustained injuries in the accident in question. Thus, the claimant-appellant was not held entitled to get any compensation in the instant claim petition, hence, the claim petition stood dismissed. The impugned award seems to be just and proper and is found to have been based on cogent finding. The award is well merited and to my firm view, it warrants no intervention. 4. For these reasons, the appeal fails and the same being bereft of any merit deserves to be dismissed, which stands dismissed in limine. 5. Consequent upon the dismissal of the appeal, the stay application does not survive and the same also stands dismissed.