GUPTA, J.—This appeal his been filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the award dated 23.1.2002 in MAC No. 913/1995, whereby the claim petition filed by the claimants-appellants has been rejected. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the claimant-appellant filed a claim petition on account of serious injuries sustained by him in an accident occurred on 27.11.1994. It was stated in the claim petition that on 27.11.1994 claimant-appellant and his officer Shri Guru Charan Singh were going on Motor Cycle No. RJ-14-8M-8726 from Jaipur to Ajmer. At about 12.00 in the noon, when they reached near Chhota Nala, a bus No. RJ-01-P-582, being driven rashly and negligently by the respondent No.1, hit the motor-cycle due to which appellant and Guru Charan Singh fell down and sustained serious injuries. After collusion with the motor cycle, the bus collided with Roadways Bus No. RJ-14P-3313. 3. The learned Tribunal has decided the issue No.1 against the claimant-appellant and concluded that there is no evidence that the present appellant was injured in the accident, dismissed the claim petition. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the relevant and specially the impugned judgment and award. 5. The contention of the present appellant is that the issue No.1 has not been decided rightly. In the statements of AW-1 and AW-2, facts were narrated and there is no reason to disbelieve the evidence produced by the claimant-appellant and hence, his claim petition should have been allowed. 6. The learned Tribunal has decided the issue No.1 against the appellant. The claimant-appellant himself has submitted Ex.1 FIR and Ex.2 Charge-sheet regarding he said accident but in Ex.1 and Ex.2, nothing has been mentioned about the collusion with the motor-cycle. It only contains the fact that Bus No. RJ-14P-582 collided with another Bus No. RJ-14P-3313 and same facts have been stated in the charge-sheet. Hence, by Ex.1 and Ex.2, the facts narrated by the claimant do not corroborate. 7. In the site plan Ex.3, prepared during the course of investigation of FIR No. 498/1997, which was regarding the accident of two buses, nothing has been stated that the motor-cycle No. RJ-14-8M-8726 was also found on the spot. 8. The claimant has also not stated that who was driving the motor-cycle at the time of accident. No mechanical report of the damaged motor-cycle has been produced. 8. The claimant has also not stated that who was driving the motor-cycle at the time of accident. No mechanical report of the damaged motor-cycle has been produced. After the accident, present claimant-appellant and his co-passenger Guru Charan Singh have also not lodged report. It was stated that the present claimant-appellant has sent a report by post after one month. It was stated that the present claimant-appellant remained hospitalized in Jaipur Hospital after the accident but discharge ticket of Jaipur Hospital has not been placed on record. 9. Thus, looking to all these infirmities, the learned Tribunal has rightly assessed the evidence and rightly had come to conclusion that no accident has occurred regarding Motor Cycle No. RJ-14-8M-8726 and the injuries, alleged to be sustained by the claimant-appellant are not due to any accident. 10. Looking at the above, there is no need to interfere with the finding and conclusion arrived at by the learned Tribunal. The appeal has thus no force and the same is hereby dismissed.