Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the impugned order of the respondent, dated 29.8.2011, is set aside and if the petitioner is permitted to appear before the respondent to put forth his case, based on the notice issued to him on 4.5.2010 and 28.7.2011 and if the respondent is directed to consider the claims made by the petitioner and pass an appropriate order thereon, as per law. 3. In view of the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the impugned order of the respondent, dated 29.8.2011, is set aside. The petitioner is permitted to appear before the respondent on 24.9.2012 and raise his objections if any, to the notice issued by the respondent, on 4.5.2010 and 28.7.2011. On such objections being raised, the respondent shall consider the same and pass an appropriate order thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No cost. Connected M.P.No.1 of 2012 is closed.