Research › Search › Judgment

Orissa High Court · body

2012 DIGILAW 41 (ORI)

SOUMYA KU. MOHAPATRA v. STATE OF ORISSA

2012-01-24

SANJU PANDA

body2012
JUDGMENT : Sanju Panda, J. - The petitioner has filed this writ application for a mandamus to the opposite parties to admit him in the First Year B.Tech Degree course basing on the Joint Entrance Examination (in short, "JEE") Ranking of 2011. The bone of contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner being a diploma holder in Electronics & Telecommunication Engineering Branch having secured First Division applied for the Orissa Joint Entrance Examination, 2011 under the General Engineering Course Code. The petitioner filled up the application form indicating Course Code No.01 which stands for General Engineering and showed qualification as Diploma Holder, necessary Admit Card was issued for General Engineering and he secured good rank in terms of Rank Card under the General Engineering. On the petitioner securing good rank in General Engineering, he was called for counselling at Khallikote College, Berhampur. However, he was turned down to take admission in the First Year B.Tech on the ground of being not eligible for First Year B.Tech as he does not possess the minimum eligibility criterion, i.e., 10+2 Examination or the equivalent Examination with Physics and Mathematics as compulsory subjects and the applicant should have scored 50% marks as per Clause-4.1.1 of the Brochure. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that Clause-4.3 of the Brochure provides for the criteria for admission to second year Degree Course in Engineering course under Lateral Entry for Diploma Holders which specifies that further the students having rank in lateral entry shall also be eligible for admission to the first year class in case the vacancies in lateral entry are exhausted. However, the admission shall be based strictly on the basis of JEE rank only. Therefore, the said Clause indicates that the diploma holder candidate though under Lateral Entry is to get admitted in second year of B.Tech but if there is no vacancy then such candidate can also be admitted in first year class basing on the JEE rank only. So also Clause 6.6 of the Brochure clearly speaks that a diploma holder is required to apply either for 1st year admission or 2nd year admission but cannot apply for both, and if he applies for both then both will be rejected. Therefore, the Brochure gives liberty to an applicant who is a diploma holder to apply for 1st year or 2nd year as he so chooses. Therefore, the Brochure gives liberty to an applicant who is a diploma holder to apply for 1st year or 2nd year as he so chooses. Accordingly, the petitioner applied indicating his Course Code as "01" in his application. Therefore, he is entitled to take admission in B.Tech 1st year course as there is no bar. 3. A counter-affidavit has been filed by opposite party no.2 clearly stating that they have strictly followed the guidelines issued by the AICTE and they have only adopted the said instruction of the AICTE and published the Brochure. In Clause 6.6 of the Brochure, they have clearly indicated giving two tables for admission to 1st year programme and for admission to 2nd year programme. The learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.2 submitted that between the date of issuance of Admit Card and the date of the Examination, there was a gap of nearly one month and the JEE had opened Counselling Centre also to clarify any doubt of candidate to appear in the Examination. Therefore, the petitioner should have, before sitting in the Examination, enquired about his eligibility to take admission in the 1st year Course, as there was no scope for the JEE authorities to check the forms filled up by the candidates for sitting in the Entrance Examination. Therefore, since the petitioner is only a diploma holder without having qualification of 10+2, he is not entitled to take admission in 1st year Course although he has obtained rank in the JEE. For better appreciation, the two tables along with the relevant portion of Clause-6.6 of the Brochure are extracted hereunder : "6.6. Course (Item -6) xx xx xx As per eligibility criteria, Diploma holders are required to apply either for First Year admission or Second Year admission but not for both, if two applications are received from one Diploma holder then both will be rejected. For Admission to First Year Programme Qualifying Exam. Course (Item -6) xx xx xx As per eligibility criteria, Diploma holders are required to apply either for First Year admission or Second Year admission but not for both, if two applications are received from one Diploma holder then both will be rejected. For Admission to First Year Programme Qualifying Exam. Course Course Code Engineering only 01 Medical only 02 Pharmacy only 03 Architecture only 04 Engineering and Medical 05 Engineering and Pharmacy 06 10+2 Engineering and Architecture 07 Medical and Pharmacy 08 Architecture and Pharmacy 09 Engineering and Medical and Pharmacy 10 Engineering, Pharmacy and Architecture 11 Entrance Test for MBA, PGDM, PGCM and PGDM (Executive) 31 Bachelor MCA 32 Degree Entrance Test for MBA, PGDM, PGCM and PGDM (Executive) and MCA 33 For Admission to Second Year Programme (Under Lateral Entry) Qualifying Exam. Course Course Code Applied Electronics & Instrumentation 51 Automobile Engineering 52 Chemical Engineering 53 Civil Engineering/Rural Technology 54 Computer Application & Programming 55 Diploma (more Computer Science and Engineering 56 than 50% marks) Electrical Engineering 58 Electronics and Telecommunication Engg 59 Information Technology 60 Mechanical Engg./Tool and Die Making 61 Metallurgical Engineering 62 Mining Engineering 63 Pharmacy 64 Textile Engineering 65 Drilling 67 BioTechnology 68 Others 69 B.Sc./+3 Sc. (Mathematics as a subject in +2 Sc.) Engineering 75 B.Sc./+3 Sc. Pharmacy 76 4. The above table clearly shows that a candidate can take admission to 1st year B.Tech Course in case he possesses 10+2 qualification and there is no anomaly in the Brochure. Rather, the JEE authorities have given a clear information in the Brochure according to the guidelines issued by the AICTE and they have also opened a Counselling Cell to give advise if the candidates have any doubt before sitting in the Examination and a candidate is also eligible to change the preference and can sit in the Examination for which he is eligible. Since there was a time gap of nearly one month, the petitioner should have availed that opportunity but he not having done so, the mistake is on the part of the petitioner. 5. From the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and the two tables extracted above, it transpires that the petitioner has filled up the form to take admission in the 1st year B.Tech Course without having 10+2 qualification and also he has not exercised his option to change the preference. 5. From the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and the two tables extracted above, it transpires that the petitioner has filled up the form to take admission in the 1st year B.Tech Course without having 10+2 qualification and also he has not exercised his option to change the preference. Therefore, the petitioner does not fulfil the criteria for which rightly at the time of counselling, the JEE authorities have declined to take him in 1st Year B.Tech Course. The writ application is accordingly dismissed. Final Result : Dismissed