Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2012 DIGILAW 4199 (MAD)

Kirby Buildings Systems India Ltd. v. Commercial Tax Officer, Vandavasi Assistant Circle, Vandavasi

2012-10-09

M.JAICHANDREN

body2012
Judgment :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. At this stage of hearing of the Writ Petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent had submitted that an efficacious alternative remedy is available to the petitioner, under Section 54 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, to challenge the impugned notice issued by the first respondent, dated 25.07.2012. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent, this Court finds that it is appropriate to dismiss the present writ petition, permitting the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy available, under Section 54 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On the petitioner filing the application for revision, challenging the impugned notice of the respondent, dated 25.07.2012, the authority concerned shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits, and in accordance with law, within a period of three months thereafter. The Writ Petition is dismissed with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P. is closed.