Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2012 DIGILAW 4250 (MAD)

Southern Enterprises, Rep. by Partner Mr. D. Dhaya Devadass v. Appellate Deputy Commissioner [CT] V C. T. Building Collector Office Campus

2012-10-11

M.JAICHANDREN

body2012
Judgment 1. Today, when this writ petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. Based on the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and in view of the endorsement made, this writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.