Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2012 DIGILAW 4344 (MAD)

R. Perumal v. Secretary To Government Industries Dept. Government of Tamilnadu

2012-10-16

M.JAICHANDREN

body2012
Judgment 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representations, dated 25.9.2012 and 9.10.2012, on merits, within a specified period. 3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representations, dated 25.9.2012 and 9.10.2012, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.