Judgment :- 1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the order dated 27.09.1999 vide which request of the petitioner for regularisation of service was declined, on the ground that the case of the petitioner was not covered under the Government order issued for regularisation. 2. It is not in dispute that the petitioner was appointed by backdoor method and not through Employment Exchange, He worked with the respondent for a period of three years. Thereafter, the petitioner was disengaged on the ground that the appointment was not by way of the regular process as he was not appointed through Employment Exchange or considering his case along with other eligible persons. 3. The petitioner did not challenge the order of disengagement, but filed representation for re-appointment by in view the Government instructions, under which a person appointed through Employment Exchange and disengaged were allowed to be reappointed. 4. The petitioner sought re-appointment on the ground that certain other employees who were not appointed through Employment Exchange, were also given appointment. The petitioner being similarly situated was also entitled to same relief. 5. On consideration, I find no merit in the writ petition. It is well established law that a wrong action does not give right to seek an other wrong. The petitioner cannot claim reappointment only on the ground that certain other persons were wrongly appointed. It is othewise well settled law, that it is not open to the Government to regularise the service of the employees appointed through the back door. No merit, dismissed. No costs.