ORDER : P. BHAVADASAN, J. 1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 22/08/2011 in MC No. 143/2010 on the file of Family Court, Kottarakkara. The petitioner before the Court below filed on application for the maintenance at the rate of Rs.20,000/- to the 1st petitioner and Rs.5,000/- to the 2nd and 3rd petitioners. The 1st petitioner claimed that she had no independent income and to take care of her children and the respondent had sufficient means to pay maintenance to the petitioners. She further averred that she is unable to carry on without maintenance from the respondent. 2. The petition was resisted by the respondent. 3. It seems that OP No. 616 of 2010 was also filed by the 1st petitioner seeking a decree for realization of Rs. Five lakhs from the respondent, which is the cost of her gold ornaments and Rs. five lakhs which was given to her as patrimony and also claiming Rs. 50 lakhs as compensation. Another OP, OP No. 358 of 2011 was filed by the husband seeking a decree for injunction restraining the respondent wife from withdrawing the amount deposited in the LIC market place. 4. On going through the order of the Court below it is seen that different session of conciliation and mediation were conducted and when conciliation became almost successful it seems that a notice was issued by the 1st petitioner to the husband calling upon him to comply with the order passed by the Learned Magistrate under the Domestic Violence Act. This notice produced before the lower Courts seems to have infuriated the learned Family Court Judge and without going to the details of the case, simply dismissed the petition. On going through the order this Court find it extremely difficult to justify the order now passed by the Trial Court. It contains no acceptable reasons and the reasons given are faulty. The reasons given to reject the claim made by the petitioner and to dismiss the petition are not all legally sustainable. It is quite unfortunate that the family Court should have passed such as an order affecting the valuable rights of parties. Hence the impugned order is set aside and family Court is directed to take the petition on file and dispose it of in accordance with law and in the light of what has been stated above.