Judgment : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondent-State. 2. The petitioner who is said to be A4 in Cr. NO. 152 of 2012 seeks bail in respect of the offence punishable under Sections 363 and 384 of the Indian Penal Code. 1860. 3. Submission made by the Petitioner’s Counsel is that, on the basis of the voluntary statement of A1, this petitioner has been arrested and secondly, only one recovery from this petitioner is said to be one ear ring in respect of the alleged incident said to have taken place on 27-3-2012 in the house of the complainant. Further submission made is that, A1 has been released on bail. 4. Having thus heard the petitioner’s Counsel and the learned Government Pleader submitting that, from this petitioner several items have been recovered though not in respect of the present case and the charge-sheet also having been filed, the petitioner therefore be asked to face the trial. 5. Having thus heard both sides and at this state, the charge-sheet is said to have been filed and the allegation against this petitioner is said to be that, at the instance of A1, this petitioner has been arrested and only one recovery from this petitioner is said to be one ear ring as per the statement of the petitioner’s Counsel, taking note of these factors into consideration, the petitioner can be released on bail by imposing conditions.- 1.) The petitioner shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond for Rs.50,000/- with two sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. 2.) He shall not tamper with the evidence and shall not give threat to the witnesses in any manner. 3.) He shall not hamper the investigation. 4.) He shall mark his attendance before the concerned police station on every Saturday between 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m till the completion of the trial. 5.) If the petitioner is found to be involved in like offences in future, bail will be cancelled at the instance of the prosecution.