Kanakadhara Flat Promoters v. The Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals)
2012-02-15
M.JAICHANDREN
body2012
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment :- 1. This writ petition has been filed against the proceedings of the respondent, dated 24.1.2012, made under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, directing the petitioner to make a pre-deposit of the entire service tax amounting to Rs.18,68,852/-, on or before 15.2.2012. 2. It had been stated, in the impugned proceedings of the respondent, that the appeal filed by the petitioner would be rejected, without further notice, on the failure of the petitioner to comply with the said condition. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that the petitioner had raised the issue of financial hardship before the respondent. However, the respondent had not considered the same, properly, before passing the impugned order, dated 24.1.2012. 4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that the petitioner would make a pre-deposit of 50% of the amount of service tax said to be payable by the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from today. On such deposit being made the respondent shall be directed to hear the appeal and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law. 5. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had submitted that the petitioner had not sufficiently substantiated its claim of financial hardship, with material evidence. Therefore, the respondent had directed the petitioner to make a pre-deposit of the entire sales tax due from the petitioner, as a pre-condition to hear the appeal filed by the petitioner. 6. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties concerned and on a perusal of the records available, this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to direct the petitioner to make a pre-deposit of 50% of the sales tax said to be payable by the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from today. On such deposit being made the respondent shall hear the appeal, in A.No.447/2011 (MST) and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. The Writ Petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.