JUDGMENT Mr. Jitendra Chauhan, J.: (Oral) - The present appeal has been filed by the claimant/appellant, challenging the impugned Award dated 1.12.1993, passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rohtak (for short ‘the Tribunal’), vide which the claim petition filed by him on account of the injuries received by him in an accident, was dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the appellant suffered injuries in an accident occurred on 18.7.1991 and his left index finger was amputated. The learned Tribunal has wrongly denied the disability certificate ‘A’ issued by the AIIMS, Delhi on 7.11.1991, wherein permanent disability shown was 24%, which would corroborate the oral testimonies of PW2 and PW3. 3. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company argued that the learned Tribunal has rightly rejected the claim petition of Ashok Kumar-claimant because there was no link evidence to connect him to the accident. 4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 5. In para No.16 of the impugned Award, the learned Tribunal has observed as under:- “.. Allegedly, Ashok Kumar son of Ram Karan received injuries in the accident, but it might be noted that there was no link evidence that he suffered any injury in the accident. He was not produced into the witness box. No copy of the medical legal report was produced. In the FIR, copy Ex.PA, there was no mention that any child of the name of Ashok Kumar had received injuries. Name of one Ashok Kumar was written in the FIR, but he had died. According to the FIR, there were three children and all the three died. In respect of the death of two children of Ram Karan, two claim petitions have been filed whereas in respect of third child namely Gobind son of Randhir, it seems that no claim petition has been filed. The claimants produced a disability certificate of Ashok Kumar son of Ram Karan aged 8 years issued by All India Institute of Medical Sciences on 7.11.1991 Mark ‘A’, according to which, Ashok Kumar was a case of traumatic amputation left index finger and his permanent disability was 24%. From this certificate, it was not linked whether he had sustained injury on the left index finger on the day of accident dated 18.7.1991.” 6. From this certificate, it was not linked whether he had sustained injury on the left index finger on the day of accident dated 18.7.1991.” 6. Regarding the statements of Ram Karan PW2 and Krishan @ Shri Krishan uncle of Ashok appearing as PW3, Ashok Kumar was admitted to Din Dayal Upadhya Hospital, Delhi. But no medical record in this regard was produced. On the contrary, the disability certificate of Ashok Kumar was issued by the AIIMS, New Delhi. Apparently, the alleged injury has no nexus with the accident in question. 7. In view of the above discussion, this Court finds no ground to interfere in the well reasoned Award dated 1.12.1993, passed by the learned Tribunal. As such, the present appeal being bereft of any merit is dismissed. --------------