Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2012 DIGILAW 889 (ALL)

STATE OF U. P. v. NAMRATA SINGH

2012-04-12

B.AMIT STHALEKAR, YATINDRA SINGH

body2012
JUDGMENT Hon’ble B. Amit Sthalekar, J.—This special appeal has been filed against the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 16.9.2008 allowing the writ petition of the petitioner-respondent and the order dated 13.5.2010 dismissing the review application of the appellants-respondents. 2. The petitioner-respondent filed writ petition seeking direction to the respondents to consider the name of the petitioner for Special B.T.C. Training Course. 3. The contention of the petitioner-respondent is that she had obtained Shiksha Shastri degree which is equivalent to B.Ed. certificate from Sri Lal Bahadur Shastri Rashtriya Sanskrit Vidyapeetha, New Delhi. She was not allowed to go for training. In para-11 of the writ petition it is mentioned that she was not sent for training and no reason was given for the same. The petitioner-respondent filed writ petition No. 48433 of 2008 which was disposed of by this Court and a direction was issued to the respondent to allow the petitioner to pursue her Special B.T.C. Course. 4. We have heard counsel for the parties. With the consent of the parties writ petition is being decided at this stage. 5. The contention of the appellants is that the mark-sheet of the Shiksha Shastri was issued to the petitioner-respondent on 13.7.1999 on which date Sri Lal Bahadur Shastri Rashtriya Sanskrit Vidyapeetha, New Delhi was not recognised by the NCTE. 6. The contention of the appellant has been rebutted by the petitioner-respondent. A counter-affidavit alongwith letter of the NCTE dated 5.8.2004 has been filed wherein it has been mentioned that Sri Lal Bahadur Shastri Rashtriya Sanskrit Vidyapeetha, New Delhi had been granted recognition by the Northern Regional Committee of NCTE for conducting Shiksha Shastri (B.Ed.) course of one duration from the academic session 1998-1999. In the said letter it was also mentioned that the Shiksha Shastri degree awarded by Sri Lal Bahadur Shastri Rashtriya Sanskrit Vidyapeetha, New Delhi is accepted by the Government for the purpose of employment. 7. In view of above, the degree of the petitioner-respondent was valid. There was no reason as to why the petitioner-respondent was not sent for training for Special B.T.C. course in question. 8. We find no merit in the present appeal. It is dismissed. ——————