RAFIQ, J.—This appeal has been preferred by the insurance company on the ground that as per the provisions of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 the liability of the insurance company would have been limited to only Rs.69,411 which was based on 40% of the proven salary of Rs.800 i.e. Rs.320 multiplied by relevant factor 216.91. Learned counsel submitted that the Tribunal has erred in law in making the insurance company liable for the entire payment. Although, the learned counsel in the course of arguments submitted that entire payment was deposited by the appellant-insurance company pursuant to the award dated 19.9.1994. The accident in the present case took place on 23.11.1991. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has submitted that the entire money was paid to the claimants long back. There was no interim order passed by this Court. Learned counsel submitted that the common issue was framed and insurance company failed to raise this issue before the Tribunal. 3. On hearing learned counsel for the parties, I find that no specific issue as to entitlement of the claimants only according to Workmen Compensation Act was framed by the Tribunal. The accident was of the year 1991, in which the claim petition was filed in 1992 and it was decided on 19.9.1994. There is no interim order by this Court. The claimants have been paid entire amount. At this distance of time, I do not find any good reason to interfere in the impugned order. 4. The appeal is dismissed.