Judgment :- 1. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the second respondent is directed to issue a fresh copy of the provisional demand notice said to have been issued to the petitioner, relating to the claim of Rs.6,44,292/-, as mentioned in the final warrant notice, dated 2.9.2009, and if the petitioner is permitted to file her objections for the same and if the second respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, within a specified period. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection for this Court passing such an order. 3. In such circumstances, the second respondent shall issue a fresh copy of the provisional demand notice, said to have been issued to the petitioner, relating to the amount claimed in the final warrant notice, dated 2.9.2009, in respect of the property situated at Door No.957/314, T.H. Road, Chellappa Colony, Old Washermenpet, Chennai. On such notice being issued, it would be open to the petitioner to file her objections, if any, within a period of two weeks thereafter. On such objections being filed by the petitioner, the second respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, within a period of four weeks thereafter. However, if no objections are filed by the petitioner, as permitted by this Court, by this order, it would be open to the respondents to initiate appropriate proceedings against the petitioner, as per law. Further, it is made clear that the second respondent shall not initiate any action against the petitioner to recover the amount, as mentioned in the final warrant notice, dated 2.9.2009, until further orders are passed by the second respondent, pursuant to this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above direction. No costs. Connected M.P.No.1 of 2009 is closed.