JUDGMENT 1. - Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, this Court finds that though the present writ petition for seeking implementation of the Industrial Tribunal Award dated 30.9.2004 would not be maintainable before this Court in view of amendment in law by amendment of Section 11(9) of the Industrial Disputes Act w.e.f. 15.9.2010. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be given liberty to make a representation to the respondent - authorities since the complete relief in pursuance of the said award has not been given to the present petitioner and some amount is still due to be paid to him besides the amount of Rs. 2,17,459/- already paid to him as noted in the order dated 30.3.2011 passed by the coordinate Bench of this Court. 3. The learned counsel for the respondents does not fairly object to this submission. 4. Accordingly this writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move a representation to the competent Authority of the respondent - Department who is expected to decide the same by speaking order after hearing the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of filing of representation. No order as to costs. 5. The interim order dated 31.5.2011 passed in absence of the petitioner will not come in the way of the respondents.Petition Disposed of. *******