A. Sagaya Mery @ Jothi v. Chennai Metropolitan Water
2013-02-18
M.JAICHANDREN
body2013
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT 1. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents had submitted that the request of the petitioner for the grant of water and sewerage connection could not be complied with, as there are arrears of water charges and tax, payable by the petitioner, in respect of the earlier water and sewerage connection, which had been granted in favour of the petitioner. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that the petitioner would pay the water and sewerage tax and charges, if any, within a period of two weeks from today. 4. Hence, on the petitioner paying the water and sewerage connection charges and tax, if any, within a period of two weeks from today, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 21.11.2012, and pass appropriate orders thereon, as per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.