Saeed-Uz-Zaman Siddiqi, J.;— Heard Mr.Deepak Kumar Singh, learned Counsel for the appellant, Mr.Jitendra Narain Mishra, learned Counsel for the Insurance Company and Mr.Shakeel Ahmad Ansari, learned Counsel appearing for the opposite parties. This appeal is directed for enhancement of Award dated 17.8.2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Faizabad in Claim Petition No.30/2005 Harish Chandra Soni versus Aftab Ali and others, whereby the Tribunal, after making one-third deductions. awarded a sum of Rs.55,000/- to the appellant. Admittedly, in the accident occurred on 5.1.2005, the appellant became permanently physically handicapped. When he preferred a claim petition before the Tribunal, the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.55,000/- as medical expenses and compensation, after making one third deductions. Sole contention raised by the appellant's counsel is that there is no need to deduct one-third or any other percentage from out of the income, towards the personal and living expenses. In support of his submissions, he has relied upon the judgment pronounced by the Apex Court in the case of Raj Kumar versus Ajay Kumar and another [ (2011) 1 SCC 343 ]. Learned counsel for the respondents have fairly conceded that the impugned judgment and Award suffers from illegality, as the Tribunal has made one third deductions. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment and Award. In para 27 of the judgment of Raj Kumar (supra), the Apex Court held as under:- "27. In the case of an injured claimant with a disability, what is calculated is the future loss of earning of the claimant, payable to the claimant, (as contrasted from loss of dependency calculated in a fatal accident, where the dependent family members of the deceased are the claimants). Therefore, there is no need to deduct one-third or any other percentage from out of the income, towards the personal and living expenses." Here, in this case, the appellant has become permanent disabled with 20% disability and admittedly, the Tribunal made one-third deductions. Therefore, the impugned judgment and Award dated 17.8.2007 need to be modified. In view of above, we allow this appeal in part and the impugned judgment and Award dated 17.8.2007 is modified to the extent that the Tribunal shall not make any deductions. _____________