Judgment :- 1. At the hearing, all the appellants and the respondents are present along with their respective advocates and they in unison stated that they voluntarily entered into the compromise as per the memo of compromise filed in this court along with the sketch, once and for all. Accordingly, they prayed for passing a final decree. They are conversant with the contents of the memo of compromise, on my questioning them. 2. S. Paramasivam- the second appellant would state that his actual name is Parameswaran but in the suit proceedings, his name has been described as Paramasivam. Hence, necessary corrections also have to be effected in the final decree. 3. Accordingly, I directed the Registry to record the statements of the second appellant-S. Paramasivam (Parameswaran) and R3-Kumaravel on the respondents' side and the Assistant Registrar (AS) recorded the statements of the second appellant-S. Paramasivam (Parameswaran) and R3-Kumaravel and marked the Memo of Compromise as Ex. P1. After that both the parties once again appeared before this Court along with their respective counsel and they prayed that a final decree may be passed incorporating the said Memo of Compromise. 4. Perused the Memo of compromise. I am having no reason not to record the same. I am of the considered opinion that the compromise arrived at between the parties is genuine and the same is accepted. The memo of compromise, Ex.P1 shall form part and parcel of the final decree. Accordingly, the final decree shall follow as per rules. 5. This second appeal is disposed of on the above terms. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.